End Citizens United Highlights In An Election

It is in a few months to go, and the midterm elections will take place. End Citizens United is doing its role by endorsing the candidates that have demonstrated their support on reforms of the campaign finances.

End Citizens United is an organization that began in 2015. It was a response to a decision made by Supreme court in 2010 in a case between FEC and Citizens United. The organization is seeking a way to overturn the decision made and support the reform of campaign finance by doing a wide range of activities. The organization has been supporting political candidates who have good track records of rejecting the dark money they are getting. The dark money is for a favor of measures, and the organization will prevent its flow into Washington. The organization is endorsing even those that are contending to unseat the Republican incumbents.

The question is how a political organization can develop from just a single case in Supreme Court? The formation of End Citizens United was to respond directly to FEC vs. Citizens United decision in 2010, which opened the flowing gates for the dark money. It was pouring the unrestricted to political candidates that are getting paid and bought for some personal gains. It prevented the candidates from representing their constituents, and they served the interests of these wealthy corporations and individuals that have donated to them millions of dollars to support their campaigns.

The End Citizens United, therefore, supports the pre-reformed candidates only. Due to the shower of this dark money that is flowing into unabated political candidates coffers, the candidates get an unfair advantage in regards to those candidates that avoid to align themselves. The role of United Citizens United is to put in level the playing ground by raising some money through grassroots efforts where it will use that money to support the pro-reform candidates. In the years that the organization has existed, it has been able to emerge as a player that is powerful in American politics. Those candidates that are endorsed by End Citizens United has many advantages because they get connections with grassroots members of ECU despite anyone having the chance for the dark money.

End Citizens United – A Political Action Group Vowing To End Big Money In Politics

End Citizens United, located in Washington, D.C., is a Political Action Committee that was founded on March 1st, 2015. Their current president and executive director is Tiffany Muller, former Deputy Political Director of the Democratic Senatorial Committee and who also served as Chief of Staff for two members of Congress.

They have a mission that involves removing big money in politics with the goal especially being the removal of a group called the Big Money 20. This is a group of Republican politicians that accept large sums of money and donations and don’t want to reform campaign financing. End Citizens United wants to overturn Citizens United, a U.S. constitutional law that deals with the regulations of political campaign spending by various organizations and to fix what they say is a rigged political system.

End Citizens United wants to accomplish this in the following ways:

1. Making it a national priority to raise the issue of money in politics.
2. Support and elect candidates who are in favor of reform.
3. Have members who are ordinary grassroots people to gain political power to
deal with the money issues in politics.
4. Work with various campaigns to pass pro-reform laws in states.

Like End Citizens United on Facebook

End Citizens United wants transparency where spending money in politics is involved and plan to recruit thousands of activist supporters around the country who will help fund the organization – and they have a great start so far this year!

In the 2016 senate race, they spent 4.4 million dollars combined to help elect Maggie Hassan, a democrat from New Hampshire and Catherine Cortez, a democrat from Nevada. End Citizens United plans to raise $35 million this year for the midterm 2018 election.

In a news article about End Citizens United, it explains how they won’t support any candidate who accepts Corporate PAC (Political Action) Money. They are standing behind and supporting Senator Cory Booker because of his stance against accepting PAC money. End Citizens United doesn’t want millionaires and billionaires controlling elections in the United States and vow to make sure the control of money in politics is removed. They will fight to end Citizens United and the power “Big Money” has on future elections and will continue until their mission is accomplished.

End Citizens United: How A Conservative Nonprofit Organization Grabbed The Headlines By Setting A Precedent At The U.S Supreme Court

In January 2008, James Bopp was barely finding his way as a prominent attorney in the U.S. The white-haired Indiana native had just gone through a complex three-judge panel that had undoubtedly made his profession a daunting task. While representing his client, Citizens United, Mr. Bopp firmly believed that the small conservative nonprofit (Citizens United) should be authorized to air Hillary: The Movie. Widely considered to a popular film by the Democrats, the movie would undeniably go a long way in persuading Americans to elect Hillary Clinton as their next president. In essence, the film depicted Hillary Clinton as modern European socialist with a ruthless political ace up her sleeve despite dressing in pantsuits.

The film also features a Kathleen Willey cameo who is famously reported to have had a fling with Bill Clinton while in the White House. However, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) opted to decline airing the movie based on 90 minute campaign ad which would grossly affect the primary season. Mr. James Bopp immediately issued a counterargument citing the movie was far from similar to a 60 minutes rendition. His remarks hardly impressed the Judge Royce Lamberth when she vividly differentiated the movie from a 60 minutes film, and even going further to inquire whether Bopp had read the transcript.

Like End Citizens United on Facebook

Two years later, Bopp emerged as the ultimate winner when the Supreme Court annulled Judge Lamberth’s verdict and instead adopted most of Bopp’s arguments. In essence, the Citizens United was undoubtedly a carefully crafted move to scrap the national campaign-finance regulations which was initially perceived as mission impossible. Currently, Mr. Bopp possesses the right legal tools to challenge and eradicate every campaign finance regulation.

Tara Malloy, an upcoming associate counsel, recently hailed Bopp’s determination and courage despite fighting federal and state campaign laws. On the other hand, reformers view Bopp’s strategy as a means of widening loopholes in the law by using his clients as pawns. Such loopholes ultimately end up benefiting the wealthy in society while casting a shadow of credibility on the main issues at hand.

Apart from making leeway in the corridors of justice, End Citizens United has also impressed by raking in significant financial returns. The Foundation recently pulled in $4 million from donations during the first quarter while also staying on course to attaining the $35 million target by 2018 Congress midterm elections. The attainment of this target would be a tremendous boost to the $25 million previously forked by the PAC in the 2016 election.

Even though the current participants stood at an impressive 100,000 people, 40,000 were newbies in donation according to Tiffany Muller, PAC’s executive director and president. Despite attaining the $12 million mark for the year, the group firmly believes that the odds are stacked against them by the Republicans.